CorelDRAW 2018 Crack INCL Keygen Free Download Latest Version CorelDRAW X8 Crack is a graphic design software. Photo projects and social media content can be made via CorelDRAW X8. CorelDRAW X8 allows you to create logos and newsletters. One can learn from CorelDRAW X8 by creating many things from it. For graphic artists, CorelDRAW X8 provides professional quality designing tools.
It provides an intuitive interface for the users. CorelDRAW X8 Crack provides you vector illustrations and imaging tools. One can create character via CorelDRAW X8. In Web designing and print designing, CorelDRAW X8 is being used. This software is licensed as a shareware for the Windows Operating System. CorelDRAW X8 does not support Mac Operating System.
CorelDRAW 8 provides the users its free trial version, which expires after a certain period of time. No need sketch on paper, try amazing Live Sketch drawing tool of CorelDRAW X8 to capture your ideas the moment creativity strikes. Now you can draw whatever comes to your mind via CorelDRAW X8. With enhanced features, it provides you 4K displays, multi-monitor viewing and more. This software provides you image-editing for digital photos. CorelDRAW X8 provides you with a built-in content organizer.
Vector and raster graphics can be created and edited via CorelDRAW X8. It’s royalty-free graphics which provides you vehicle templates, fonts, clip-art and many digital images for editing. This software provides more than a hundred various file formats. CorelDRAW X8 Full Crack Plus Serial Number CorelDRAW X8 Crack is even more like Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator, you can customize your interface according to your desires.
At various experience levels, it provides you with an extensive set of documentation and educational tools. With the filtering feature and font search, you can quickly find the font. It delivers a professional quality, so make a long-lasting impression in any medium by unique logos and signs. Colour accuracy and flexibility you need, is provided by CorelDRAW X8. How is it possible to sketch on CorelDRAW X8?
Is CorelDRAW X8 free of cost? Does CorelDRAW X8 support Mac? What are the pros and cons of CorelDRAW X8?
Is CorelDRAW X8 better than Adobe? CorelDRAW X8 free download: You can download the free trial version of this amazing application. It also provides you with the guide, which tells you about the features and tools of CorelDRAW X8 briefly so that you do not face difficulty in any step. CorelDRAW X7 download: CorelDRAW X7 does not need any internet connection while creating and editing your creative work. It lets you create any character, design a website and more things to design digitally. CorelDRAW X8 tutorials: CorelDRAW X8 gives you free tutorials about the usage, interface, enhanced tools and features.
These tutorials tell you to step by step when, where and what tools you have to use. CorelDRAW X8 serial number: Every individual feature is of some cost price. So as the different feature is purchased by the users, they have been given a serial number for that specific feature. The user will give this keygen after installation process and will be accessed further. CorelDRAW X8 Features:. It lets you create any sort of graphics by tracing tools and flexible drawing.
Professional photo editing feature is offered by CorelDRAW X8. It shows objects and Website can easily be designed. It allows you to copy curve segments. Workspace customization also takes place in CorelDRAW X8. It provides Corel font filtering, searches and font manager tools.
It lets you hide and show objects. Knife tool is also provided by CorelDRAW X8. It supports Windows 10 and 4K display SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:. Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 10.
For those looking for an easy and quick way to return or migrate to Adobe after trying MadCap Flare, I’ve created an enhanced project converter. The Flare-to-RoboHelp Project Converter is free and can be downloaded on my website.
This is especially timely because of Adobe’s which provides a 40% discount on RoboHelp for a limited time for those switching from another tool. So why did I create the converter in the first place? I’ve been teaching thousands of authors how to use RoboHelp since its inception 20 years ago. Each release brought innovative features and workflows that made it so friendly to use for non-developers.
That is, until Macromedia bought the old eHelp Corporation! Unfortunately, development stopped for several years between 2003 – 2006. Understandably, many authors (including me!) started looking for alternatives out of fear of being left behind.
It was that fear, uncertainty and doubt that caused some RoboHelpers to give Flare a try. After all, it was developed by former members of the old eHelp RoboHelp team.
The assumption was that it would have the look and feel and usability of the original RoboHelp. But, for many, it was a disappointment. Not that Flare didn’t have fine features. My clients simply felt that Flare’s user interface was far too “technical” and the workflows so much more cumbersome compared to RoboHelp. There was also a much steeper learning curve.
Make no mistake. Flare is a fine product.
But many authors feel it takes more than list of marketing buzzword features to be really useful in the long run. The workflows need to be logical and cater to technical communicators who want to spend more time helping their readers than learning some new technical way of doing things. These authors who flirted with Flare missed the ease of use they recalled when they used RoboHelp.
Then, something amazing happened. Adobe Systems bought Macromedia and management saw great potential for new development. In particular, they could see how RoboHelp could be combined with Adobe FrameMaker, Adobe Captivate, Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Photoshop and be part of a family of “best of breed” applications for technical communicators.
They called it. Since taking over RoboHelp, there have been four releases that have incorporated the technologies and workflows authors have requested. It is clear now that RoboHelp will remain the leader and continue its long-standing innovative path. In other words, “it’s safe to return home.” Those returning to RoboHelp from Flare tell me they had no idea that Adobe had made so many innovations and improvements. Among the many new things they found were:.
A much-requested way to provide content based on categories such as “role-based” or “location-based” or any other sub-group the author prefers. Each category has its own Content, Index, Search and Glossary to find what’s relevant to them. Robust search enhancements such as External Content Search for Web 2.0 content curation, integration of Google search, and more options for end users to maximize their search results. Community-generated content with RoboHelp’s unique and popular AIR Help output that provides moderated end-user commenting “out of the box” with no extra add ons. The most outputs of any tool including Adobe FlashHelp, Eclipse Help, JavaHelp, AIR Help, WebHelp, Acrobat PDF as well as mobile and device XML formats such as ePUB. Adobe RoboHelp Server which provides user Feedback Analytics reports and a way to authenticate users and manage access to content.
At conferences like WritersUA, STC Summits and LavaCon, folks have asked me if it was possible to convert a MadCap Flare™ project to an Adobe® RoboHelp® 7, 8 or 9 project. So as part of my consulting practice, I decided to create a quick and easy (and free) value add for my clients with this converter and help authors return to RoboHelp. Now, anyone can. It is provided free on an “as is” basis. Please take a look at the 3-minute Adobe Captivate video tutorial (embedded in this blog post) to see it in action. Depending on the combination of Flare and RoboHelp versions that are used, these features are usually converted successfully.:.
Topics. CSS.
TOC and Keyword Index. Glossary. Snippets. User Defined Variables. Conditional Build Tags.
Context Sensitive Help (CSH) Map files. Headers and footers are converted to Snippets similar to Flare. See Also and Related Topics links are NOT supported at this time.A very few items may require “tweaking” after the conversion. This will depend on the version of Flare and the version of RoboHelp. I have tested all the way back to Flare v2.1 up until Flare v7.2 and with RoboHelp 7, 8 and 9 with successful results.
Fortunately it only takes a five or ten minutes to see how well it works for you. To all the authors returning home to RoboHelp after their fling with Flare, I thank you. And, welcome back! Is president of Evergreen Online Learning, LLC, based in Evergreen, Colorado. A frequent speaker at national online help conferences, John is an Adobe Certified RoboHelp, Captivate and Acrobat Connect Professional Instructor.
He has taught RoboHelp since 1992 and Adobe Captivate since it was introduced. His speaking engagements include the STC Manhattan Chapter, STC Summits in Minneapolis, Atlanta, Philadelphia, WritersUA and LavaCon conferences. John is a member of the Society for Technical Communication (Rocky Mountain Chapter) and has a Bachelor of Science degree in Journalism from the University of Houston. He began his career in broadcast news as a reporter for the NBC television affiliate in Houston, Texas.
You can also follow John Twitter.
10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid 10 Best Screen Recording Software for Windows - Free & Paid image/svg+xml image/svg+xml image/svg+xml image/svg+xml. Have you decided to try screencasting for the first time? Or are you an adept user and want to upgrade your experience with a new tool? Here we have researched and compared the 10 best screen recording software for Windows (both free and paid) to help you find an ideal fit for your specific needs. While versions of recording software differ in price and functionality, most share a number of features such as:. adjustable video frame.
cut-and-paste editing options. unlimited recording time. direct link to social media Which tool should you use for making an effective video tutorial, marketing your business to online customers, or even recording a new maneuver in your favorite game? This short list is all you need to make an informed decision and start creating. Free Screen Recording Software That Saves Money Have you tackled numerous trial versions and received nothing close to the bang for the buck you expected? Or are you simply looking to save some money? In either case, there are plenty of free screen recorders that can get your job done with the most satisfying results and without emptying your wallet.
A word of caution, though; some may urge a paid upgrade after you have already downloaded a “free” tool. Here, we have compiled five safe and, at the same time, outstanding free screen recorders that successfully compete with the best paid screen recorders. ISpring Free Cam is a really simple free screen recorder with a built-in audio/video editor. The attractive and intuitive interface allows you to create screencasts with the ease of a professional. Even though this software is free, it doesn’t place any watermark and it’s ad-free. Pros.
no watermark, time limits and ads. records voice-overs and computer sounds. high-quality resolution. users can save videos as WMV or upload them directly to YouTube. easily deletes unwanted fragments of video. removes background noise.
wide selection of audio effects Cons. saves recordings to WMV only. no webcam recording Watch this demo to see what you can do with iSpring Free Cam: 2. DVDVideoSoft’s Free Screen Video Recorder is a full-featured but lightweight free screen recorder from a developer known for its free conversion software. It is capable of recording Skype conversations without any limitations and, therefore, useful for Skype interviews and online conference calls.
Similarly, different applications for Windows can be singled out and captured as discrete elements. Included is a basic and user-friendly image editor, surprisingly helpful for attaining a polished look. Pros. offers a convenient screenshot feature.
different modes for recording screen and video. suitable for recording Skype conversations. step-by-step instructions provided on the website. available in 10 languages.
output formats include BMP, TGA, JPEG, PNG, and GIF Cons. microphone sound recording only. excessive ads may interrupt your work.
Madcap Flare Download 12
saves recordings to AVI only. lacks coherent interface and built-in media player. may install unwanted software during download.
does not notify users if disconnection occurs 3. ShareX is an open-source ad-free tool that boasts almost as many custom features as some paid software screen recorders. ShareX is mostly targeted towards developers and power users, so an average customer might be lost in the cornucopia of advanced tools and editors.
Pros. records full screen, window, monitor, region, freehand, or scrolling. incorporates hotkeys for easier and quicker navigation.
supports many URL sharing services. imports existing videos, music, or photos. custom watermarks and color effects Cons. low quality of game recording. complicated for an average user.
no webcam recording. reported to fail while uploading large files. no video editor 4. CamStudio is a good choice for one-time or occasional users with minimal editing needs. This lightweight, open-source screen recording software creates videos in AVI format that can later be converted to SWF. While its compactness appeals to some, others call for further development and increased technical support.
Pros. creates a screen-in-screen video. converts AVI format into Flash. allows you to create small size files.
custom cursor. available quality options for output video Cons. reported to spread harmful viruses and malware. output is incompatible with certain browsers. audio falls out of sync. SWF files may slow down your computer. lack of interactive and animation features.
![]()
minimal tech support 5. Ezvid claims to be the world’s easiest screen recorder, and they may be not too far away from the truth. Ezvid’s clarity is enhanced by the product’s speed: specifically designed to save users’ time, it will help you to produce and upload videos directly to YouTube in a matter of minutes.
That is why the tool enjoys notoriety among gamers and movie fans who are interested in frequently making video clips in the quickest manner possible. Pros. offers computer speech for narrative purposes. automatic high-quality resolution (1280 x 720p HD). speed control over output videos. sleek and modern interface.
instantaneous upload to YouTube. selection of popular music tracks included Cons.
reviewers report extraneous noise. minor bugs and inconsistencies. fullscreen game is not available Paid Screen Recording Software That We Love The Internet’s bountiful supply of screen recording products means one is bound to find free and low-cost options. However when searching for high quality performance, elaborate presentation, and expert technical support, many users are ready to invest their money in paid software. Here are six paid screen recorders that have gained customers’ and reviewers’ trust and now continue to expand their eminent presence in the market.
Camtasia Studio is a feature-packed tool for detail-oriented enthusiasts. It allows you to record audio and video one after the other, combining the results afterwards. While the price might turn some off at $299 per license, tech-savvy individuals are sure to appreciate the capabilities for customizing and refining their work.
A 30-day free trial is available. Pros. audio, video, and cursor tracks can be edited separately. imports existing videos, music, or photos. adds captions, callouts, and quizzes to your videos. offers zooming and panning options.
incorporates webcam. frame-by-frame editing Cons. one of the most expensive screen recorders.
slows down on large and heavy projects. requires periodic paid upgrades. busy multi-track interface. limited 30-day free trial 7. MadCap Mimic is a versatile multimedia tool ideal for creating interactive videos and simulations. Here you can work in three recording modes – manual, automatic, or full-motion – and enjoy an array of single-sourcing features such as custom frames and condition tags. Pricing options include $144 per year or $428 for life.
You can likewise select a 30-day free trial. Pros. allows you to create video with interactive content.
saves design content that can be reused later. output formats include WebM, MP4, and Adobe PDF. a large range of available visuals and video effects. multi-language team of technical support engineers. free product upgrades with the paid version Cons. watermarks appear on output.
occasional bugs reported by users. hefty interface may be difficult to navigate. limited 30-day free trial 8.
FlashBack by Blueberry Software is a full-motion-based screen recorder with a simple and handy interface. It is particularly popular among university professors and students. This may be explained by the agreeable pricing: you can choose between a personal license ($49) and a business license ($99), both of which come with a free 30-day trial, or download a fully free version without editing features. Pros. records multiple monitors. allows you to add distinctive and custom watermarks. incorporates webcam.
offers zooming and panning options. provides a TechAssistant feature for reporting PC defects Cons. difficult to modify existing demos. allows you to import files only in FBR format. does not track the movement of windows in use. limited 30-day free trial 9.
TinyTake by MangoApps is a sophisticated screen recorder ideal for commercial presentations and employee training. To many, its primary appeal is an easy sharing feature that lets one attach an output file to any messenger or send it to an office device. A free version is available for personal use only.
![]()
Commercial buyers will pay between $29.95 and $199.95 per year, depending on the included capabilities. Pros. bulk file sharing. public URL available for sharing. allows you to create custom shortcut keys. built-in online file viewer for images, videos, and documents.
video player is compatible with mobile devices. proxy server friendly Cons. video recording is limited to 2 hours. free version has 5 min limit for video recording. video files are saved as MP4 only. versions under $99.95 are significantly limited in features. no free trial available 10.
Screencast-O-Matic With relatively low prices and a simplified free version, is marketed to compete with free screen recording software for educators and businesses. For multiple users, Screencast-O-Matic offers a site license with prices ranging from $9 per month for 10 computers to $250 per month for 1000 computers. Additional expenses come with Pro Hosting, available in three plans: $10, $29, and $99 per month. You can start with a 30-day free trial.
My DITA journey. 1.9 → 10 reasons for moving away from DITA Several people have asked me why I'm moving away from DITA. During my API workshop at TC Camp, near the end, one experienced DITA person said, What couldn't you do with DITA in publishing API documentation?
Another reader recently said, I'm curious to know why you're moving away from DITA, since we're thinking about adopting it. If you looked at my, you'd see that posts about DITA topped the lists for the most commented on posts. I wrote a lot about DITA in 2014, and even compiled, including many OxygenXML webhelp hacks. But now I've decided that DITA is not the way to go for me. Before I list my 10 reasons for not using DITA, let me list a few things about DITA I really liked. 10 things I like about DITA 1. Text-file formats No more need to create and author content using some fancy rich text editor that hides the source behind a wall of mystery.
With text-file formats, you can work directly with the source. Revision control integration Because you can work with text file formats, DITA files work well with revision control repositories. This means you can bypass a CMS and collaborate with others using the same collaborative architecture as developers. Open source aspect of DITA OT I love the open source aspect of the DITA OT. This open standard allows you to author content that numerous vendors support and handle. You can jump from vendor to vendor without having to lock your content into a proprietary format.
Conditional filtering from a structured taxonomy I like how you can set up filtering based on specific attributes (such as product, platform, or audience), and then set specific values for those attributes. Oxygen prompts you with options for the attribute in a quick, easy way. OxygenXML If there was ever an editor I fell in love with, it was OxygenXML. Nearly everything it does is right on target. Oxygen's latest enhancement allows you to switch to different filtered views to dynamically hide content you don't want to see - this was a lifesaver in simplifying the authoring process when I added an abundance of attributes on the same page. Ayyappa devotional veeramani songs tamil free download.
A markup built specifically for tech comm Unlike other models that writers simply adapt for their needs, DITA is built with technical writers in mind. Everything about the authoring and publishing experience is accounted for, and there is almost no scenario you can't handle with DITA. Conref, keyref I love a lot of the core DITA functionality around re-use.
Conref elements are great for re-using content in different places, and keyref elements are an ingenious way of handling link references that might change. Batch publishing This may not be DITA specific, but one thing I liked about OxygenXML is its ability to kick off a dozen publishing jobs with just a couple of clicks (leveraging DITAVAL files to define the filters applied with each build). You can set up all kinds of publishing outputs and initiate the builds with almost no effort at all. Parent-child link functionality It may be a small thing, but it's cool how you can specify that child pages get embedded onto the parent page, showing summaries and a link for each child page. This worked especially well when I had a task involving numerous individual topics as separate steps, and I wanted to create an overview task. The Yahoo DITA group The Yahoo DITA group is an amazing resource when you're working in DITA.
A lot of knowledgeable people are ready to help out and provide helpful answers and information. Overall, there's a strong DITA community in tech comm (even though, according to Maxwell Hoffman, DITA adoption is only at about 15% of the tech comm market). Given all of these reasons, you may be wondering why I've decided to move away from DITA. Well, I haven't made an official decision, since I'm only running a pilot project with another platform, but I've already fallen in love with this new platform. So here are my reasons for moving away from DITA. 10 reasons to move away from DITA 1.
DITA doesn't easily integrate into existing web frameworks. There are a lot of web frameworks such as Bootstrap, Zurb Foundation, and others that provide ready-made, responsive stylesheets that give you a host of components, from alerts to panels to navigation menus and much more, all with a simple style. Hooking into these web frameworks is not only key for jumpstarting your design, these frameworks also give you templates that display well across mobile and tablet devices. Trying to design without these frameworks is like trying to build illustrations in MS Paint instead of Adobe Illustrator - you could probably do it, but the latter will save you weeks of time and allow you to focus on developing your content. DITA doesn't easily integrate with JavaScript libraries.
I spent a lot of time integrating various JavaScript libraries into Oxygen's webhelp output, and each time I had to resort to some special hack to get it to work (for example, see my ). This is because Oxygen's webhelp strips out a lot of the elements (such as product, audience, platform, etc.) that would normally be coded as data elements to allow JavaScript listeners to trigger. You can make a lot of these JavaScript libraries work in DITA, but it's a major hassle.
You have to figure out what HTML the XML elements get rendered into (e.g., section becomes h2, but the ID tag for the section element gets prepended with the topic ID followed by double underscores ). The IDs and classes are critical in order for the JavaScript plugins to work. I never bought into DITA's information typing model. I agree with task-oriented authoring, but enforcing information typing isn't for me. I later learned that there is something called 'core DITA' that ignores the specializations (concept, task, reference). If you author in core DITA, you're just using basic topic types. I eventually switched to core DITA, but so much DITA momentum and energy seems to revolve around developing even more topic types and enforcing them (for example, a new topic type for troubleshooting is being developed).
Enforcing topic types seems too extreme to me. Other HATs don't force you to write to a specific model whose shape (more often than not) doesn't exactly fit what you're documenting. I implemented a lot of workarounds when using tasks and concepts in order to get around DITA's rules. In the end, I figured I should just use my common sense and writerly instincts when deciding how to structure my content. For example, sometimes it really does make sense to use level 3 subheadings, and I shouldn't have to resort to complex element nesting to do it. DITA's topic types also encourage you to write in tiny little topics, and promises of glueing topics together don't work so well (e.g., the OT doesn't put relationship tables in the right spot, and it's difficult to link to a set of topics (e.g., topicsetref)). Overall, I felt a bit empty following Darwin Information Typing Architecture when I wanted to remove the 'information typing' aspect of it all.
Writing in XML is a chore. Writing in XML is more cumbersome and complex, since it's not just a matter of knowing what elements to use, but knowing the order of elements that is allowed.
Many vendors create visual editors to hide the complexity, but this ends up removing you from the text file format and creates another wall in front of the source. I can live with the XML tags, but the language is extremely verbose. For example, to set off code, you have to surround it with codeph elements. I wrote about this verboseness in a previous post titled. Markdown, in contrast, is much simpler and more enjoyable to work in. To set off code, you surround it with `backticks`. If you like working in text file formats, Markdown is a joy to use.
Shouldn't writers, who spend so much time developing content, enjoy the format and syntax they're writing in? Open source DITA solutions develop too slowly. I'm not knocking the fact that the DITA spec is slow to evolve, with literally one update every 5 years (2005, 2010, and 2015). New DITA tools come on scene at least once a year (e.g. EasyDITA, Fluid Topics, Componize), but how many of these new tools are open source? In contrast, how many of those tools are sold by proprietary vendors charging thousands of dollars at a yearly subscription rate? The average cost of an online DITA CMS for a minimum amount of content will cost at least $30k a year, which seems steep given the fact that there are so many alternative authoring platforms available for free.
You can't easily customize the output. If you've ever tried to customize your webhelp output to match your website's brand (beyond changing the logo and a few simple colors), you realize that HATs make this customization really hard. With DITA, it's even more difficult, since you have to customize the XSL-FO stylesheet that transforms the XML elements into HTML.
And then you have to modify the webhelp plugin files (for which there is rarely any documentation). In contrast, I was able to customize much of my Jekyll template in an afternoon using simple CSS and HTML. DITA doesn't integrate well with other non-DITA content.
If you have to integrate with support content, developer contributions, or marketing, most likely they'll give you HTML. You'll then need to figure out how to mix your XML with their HTML. You can convert their HTML into your XML source, or try to merge your XHTML output with other HTML at runtime.
Basically, other groups won't easily integrate your DITA content, and it's a near impossible task to win other groups over to DITA. You could try to roll out a vendor's proprietary Word-like template to facilitate their XML authoring, or you could just author in HTML. Authoring in HTML is actually a lot easier than writing in XML, and you can do more with it. I think that technical writers who insist on authoring in XML are isolating themselves from the rest of their work organizations. Rather than acting as curators and integrators, the XML format creates walls and silos between content. Everything I wanted to do with DITA, I can do with Markdown and Liquid on Jekyll.
I thought DITA was the only technology that would allow things like conref, keyref, conditional filtering, content re-use, and more. Then someone showed me how Jekyll can process both Markdown and Liquid. Liquid offers a programming language that you can use directly on the page for if-else statements, loops, includes, variables, and more. In fact, you can even tag pages and generate lists of those tagged pages. With Liquid, you can do a lot more than you can with DITA.
(Understanding Liquid's capabilities was the key that allowed me to consider another platform.) 9. Innovation with DITA is too reliant on vendors. If you want to try something innovative with DITA, you're mostly reliant on vendors for the innovation. You can't freely pull from the many JavaScript, CSS, and other libraries on the web to build your innovation. (If you have strong XML development skills, I'm sure there are open source frameworks you can leverage, but the communities for them are much smaller.) In contrast, with other solutions that allow you to freely integrate other code bases and libraries, you can build solutions that leverage a ton of open source or freely licensed code. And because many, many more engineers are using web technologies in the platforms they build, you can get help on sites like StackOverflow.com and more.
You're part of a global Internet community, not just a little niche of DITA XML writers. DITA is the wrong language for the API doc space. One of the areas I'm focusing on is API documentation. Very few development shops have a DITA XML setup, in part because developers are involved in contributing, reviewing, and publishing the documentation that supports their APIs, SDKs, and other tools.
Trying to shoehorn DITA into an API software shop is like trying to fit a size 6 shoe onto a professional basketball player's foot - it simply doesn't fit. Conclusion A post like this no doubt invites someone to rebut each of these 10 points, showing that in fact DITA can satisfy each of these conditions. For example, I know someone is building an open-source HTML5 webhelp plugin for DITA that will probably have many of these web and JavaScript features. That's great, but there's just not enough momentum with DITA as there is with other web technologies. One guy building one solution that takes three years to complete can't compete with thousands of web developers across the globe building plugins, frameworks, themes, and more, and sharing them with each other through open, forkable repositories on a daily basis. In short, DITA can't compete with the momentum of the web.
In closing, I just want to say that DITA may be a good strategy in certain situations, such as for large teams trying to standardize authoring and publishing in global contexts. But for a semi-lone writer who loves web publishing and is creative in trying out different approaches, DITA is the wrong platform.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |